The Respondent sought costs after the Applicant's urgent motion to prevent her relocation was denied.
The Applicant opposed the costs order, citing the Respondent's alleged breach of their separation agreement regarding notice for relocation and claims of misleading the court.
While acknowledging the Applicant's motion might have been granted pre-COVID and his insistence on the agreement's terms was reasonable, the court found the Respondent's requested costs quantum reasonable.
Ultimately, the court ordered each party to bear their own costs.