The applicant, charged with first-degree murder, sought leave to cross-examine the affiant of a general warrant that led to the collection of her DNA.
The applicant argued that the police failed to disclose opportunities to collect cast-off DNA without a warrant, which undermined the precondition that the warrant was in the best interests of the administration of justice.
The court applied the Garofoli test and granted leave, finding that cross-examination on the availability of cast-off DNA was necessary to ensure the applicant's right to make full answer and defence.