The appellant, a Mental Retardation Counsellor, was charged with common assault after striking a severely mentally retarded adult patient.
The appellant claimed the protection of section 43 of the Criminal Code, arguing he was a person standing in the place of a parent or a schoolteacher correcting a child or pupil.
The Supreme Court of Canada held that section 43 does not apply, as a mentally retarded adult is not a 'child' or 'pupil', and a counsellor is not a 'parent' or 'schoolteacher' within the meaning of the provision.
The appeal was dismissed and the conviction upheld.