The plaintiff brought a motion to set aside a registrar’s order dismissing his civil action as abandoned and sought extensions to validate or extend service of the statement of claim and amend the claim.
The underlying action alleged negligent investigation and malicious prosecution arising from a traffic stop and drug-related charges that were later stayed.
The court applied the contextual factors governing reinstatement of actions dismissed for delay, including explanation for delay, inadvertence, promptness of the motion, and prejudice to the defendants.
The court found the delay insufficiently explained, the evidence regarding counsel’s health issues unsubstantiated, and the motion not brought promptly after dismissal.
Presumed and potential actual prejudice to the defendants was not rebutted.
The court declined to set aside the dismissal order.