The applicant and respondent disputed the date of separation, the respondent's date of marriage assets, and the respondent's income for child support purposes.
The court determined the date of separation to be July 3, 2014, when joint marriage counselling ended and there was no reasonable prospect of resuming cohabitation.
The court rejected the respondent's claim of a $200,000 date of marriage asset due to lack of evidence.
Finally, the court imputed an annual income of $75,000 to the respondent for child support, finding him intentionally under-employed.
The respondent was ordered to pay equalization and post-separation adjustments.
