The landlords appealed a decision of the Landlord and Tenant Board awarding the tenants rent abatement for a rodent infestation.
The landlords argued the Board erred in its definitions of landlord and tenant, and in finding they failed to meet their maintenance obligations.
The Divisional Court dismissed the appeal, finding no errors of law in the Board's definitions and holding that the Board's conclusions regarding the infestation and maintenance obligations were unappealable findings of fact or mixed fact and law.
