The plaintiffs brought a motion seeking relief to prevent an administrative dismissal and to permit substituted service of court documents.
The court considered evidence that the responding party had been difficult to serve and that traditional service methods were ineffective.
The court found that staying any administrative dismissal was necessary in the interests of justice.
The court further concluded that service by posting the documents to the responding party’s Facebook page was likely to bring the materials to their attention.
The motion was granted and the requested orders were directed to issue.
