The plaintiffs brought an action against a municipality for damages arising from a trip and fall on a sidewalk.
The court considered whether the sidewalk was in a state of disrepair under s. 44 of the Municipal Act, 2001 and whether the municipality could rely on statutory defences.
The court found that a significant sidewalk crack and height differential constituted a state of disrepair and that the municipality failed to establish that it had taken reasonable steps to prevent the default.
The plaintiff pedestrian was found contributorily negligent for failing to pay adequate attention despite familiarity with the defect.
Damages were awarded for personal injury, wage loss, and related losses, subject to a 25% reduction for contributory negligence.