The applicant sought leave to issue a Writ of Seizure and Sale against the respondent, based on an assigned judgment.
The respondent had previously received a full and final release from the prior assignee after funds were provided by the applicant and her common-law partner.
The court determined that these funds constituted consideration for a 25% ownership interest in the respondent's property, rather than a loan.
Consequently, the original judgment was deemed satisfied, and the applicant's request for a new writ was dismissed to prevent double recovery.
