The appellant appealed his convictions and sentence for sexual assault, assault, and mischief arising from incidents involving his wife.
He argued the sexual assault conviction was unreasonable and that the trial judge failed to conduct a proper W.(D.) analysis of the evidence.
The Superior Court of Justice dismissed the conviction appeal, finding sufficient evidence to support the sexual assault conviction and that the trial judge properly assessed credibility under the W.(D.) framework.
The sentence appeal was also dismissed, as the 73-day intermittent sentence was not demonstrably unfit.
