The respondent brought a motion seeking full authority to conduct the sale of the jointly owned matrimonial home, alleging the applicant was unreasonably stalling the process.
The court declined to grant the respondent sole control over the sale, noting a lack of independent professional evidence regarding the appropriate listing price.
However, recognizing the high-conflict nature of the case, the court imposed strict terms and timelines for obtaining appraisals, listing the property, and responding to offers.
The court also permitted the respondent to proceed with an access motion separately from the support issues.
No costs were awarded due to divided success and the unreasonable behaviour of both parties.
