2 total
Judicial review of HRTO decisions dismissing complaints and declaring applicant a vexatious litigant dismissed.
The applicant sought judicial review of three Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario decisions that dismissed his five applications alleging discrimination and reprisal by the respondent church, and declared him a vexatious litigant.
The Divisional Court applied a reasonableness standard of review and found no errors of law or unreasonable findings of fact in the Tribunal's decisions.
The application for judicial review was dismissed, and costs of $3,000 were awarded to the respondent.
Adjournment and request to adduce late psychiatric report denied due to irrelevance and prejudice.
The self-represented applicant sought to introduce a psychiatric report the day before the hearing without a proper affidavit or motion for fresh evidence.
The applicant requested an adjournment to properly serve a notice of motion.
The Divisional Court dismissed the request for an adjournment and refused to admit the report, finding it irrelevant to the issues and noting that an adjournment would prejudice the responding parties.
