Who is Richard Nolin?

Richard Nolin is an Ontario lawyer with 3 court cases on record from 2015 to 2022.

What courts has Richard Nolin appeared in?

Richard Nolin has appeared in Superior Court of Justice.

How many cases has Richard Nolin handled?

Richard Nolin has 3 cases on record from 2015 to 2022.

What judges has Richard Nolin appeared before?

Richard Nolin has most frequently appeared before Justice R. D. Gordon, Justice K.E. Cullin, Justice Louise L. Gauthier.

Richard Nolin | Lawyer

3 total

Chevrier v. Orsanic, 2022 ONSC 6508

The moving party defendant sought to set aside a noting in default and to strike an affidavit she had previously sworn.

The underlying action arose from an ATV accident where the moving party was the driver and the plaintiff was a passenger.

The moving party had previously sworn an affidavit claiming ownership of the ATV, leading to the dismissal of the action against her common-law spouse.

After the plaintiff's claim was settled by the insurers, they sought subrogation against the moving party, who then claimed she had lied about owning the ATV to protect her spouse's assets.

The court dismissed the motion to set aside the noting in default, finding that doing so would cause substantial prejudice to the innocent insurers who had relied on her representations.

The request to strike the affidavit was also dismissed as moot and inappropriate for a preliminary motion.

SCJNov 23, 2022

Respondent Counsel

Herbert Lindsay v. Kilganan Group Ltd. and Byron Turner, 2015 ONSC 5475

The plaintiff brought a motion for summary judgment in a mortgage enforcement action seeking repayment and possession of the mortgaged property following default.

The defendants argued that the parties had reached an oral agreement granting a moratorium on payments and suspending enforcement while the development project progressed.

Applying the summary judgment framework from Hryniak v. Mauldin, the court used its fact‑finding powers to evaluate credibility and draw inferences from the evidentiary record.

The court found no credible evidence establishing a binding forbearance agreement and concluded that the defendants failed to prove any modification to the mortgage terms.

Summary judgment was granted and the plaintiff obtained judgment for the principal, interest, and possession of the property.

SCJSep 2, 2015

Applicant Counsel

Carson v. Scheuer, 2015 ONSC 2593

The defendants brought a motion to dismiss the plaintiff's action for delay.

The action arose from a 1997 bicycle accident on the defendants' property, with the statement of claim issued in 2001.

The court found that the 13.5-year delay was inordinate and inexcusable, and that the plaintiff failed to rebut the presumption of prejudice, especially given that the defendants were now mentally incapable of instructing counsel.

The court exercised its inherent jurisdiction to dismiss the action.

Applicant Counsel