The self-represented appellant appealed a family law trial judgment regarding the valuation date, pension, matrimonial home, net family property, and child support.
At the outset, the appellant brought a motion to admit fresh evidence, which was dismissed as the evidence could have been adduced at trial.
The Court of Appeal found no basis to interfere with the trial judge's findings or her exercise of trial management powers to curtail irrelevant cross-examination.
The appeal was dismissed with costs.
