2 total
Application dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as the respondent is a federally-regulated transportation undertaking.
The applicant filed an application alleging discrimination in employment against the corporate respondent, an international moving services company.
The corporate respondent requested the application be dismissed on the basis that it is a federally-regulated company engaged in interprovincial and international transportation.
The Tribunal found it plain and obvious that the corporate respondent's labour relations fall under federal jurisdiction pursuant to s. 92(10)(a) of the Constitution Act, 1867.
The application was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
Monetary penalty of $2,000 confirmed on consent for overcrowding licensed premises.
The Licensee appealed an Order of Monetary Penalty issued by the Registrar of the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario for permitting more persons in the licensed premises than the maximum capacity allowed.
The parties submitted an Agreed Statement of Facts admitting that there were up to 275 persons in an area licensed for 196 persons, in violation of section 43 of Ontario Regulation 719/90 under the Liquor Licence Act.
The Board upheld the violation and confirmed the agreed monetary penalty of $2,000.
