The applicant sought ongoing income replacement benefits and supplementary medical expenses following a motor vehicle accident.
The insurer had terminated benefits based on a Designated Assessment Centre (DAC) report concluding the applicant could perform the essential tasks of his employment.
The arbitrator found the applicant was not a credible witness and drew adverse inferences from his failure to produce relevant medical and employment records despite prior agreements to do so.
The arbitrator concluded the applicant failed to prove he was employed at the time of the accident or that his ongoing symptoms, including depression, were caused by the accident rather than pre-existing conditions.
The application was dismissed, and the applicant was ordered to pay $4,000 in expenses to the insurer due to his lack of success and failure to comply with production undertakings.