Following a motion to change brought by the father seeking to terminate ongoing child support retroactively and to terminate an obligation to fund a registered education savings plan, the mother was wholly successful.
The court considered costs under Rule 24 of the Family Law Rules.
Although the moving party’s conduct at trial was deficient in certain respects, it did not rise to the level of bad faith warranting substantial indemnity costs.
As the successful party had made no offer to settle, the court ordered partial recovery.
Costs were fixed at 66% of full recovery and made enforceable through the Family Responsibility Office.