The appellants appealed a partial summary judgment that decided a 'guarantee' issue and a 'priority' issue in favour of the respondent.
The motion judge made factual findings regarding the timing of a franchise transfer and the relationship between two companies based on documentary evidence.
The motion judge also dismissed the appellants' cross-motion regarding the interpretation of a settlement agreement, finding that the respondent could exercise multiple remedies upon default.
The Court of Appeal upheld the motion judge's findings, concluding they were properly made under Rule 20, and dismissed the appeal.
