The moving parties sought party status in an appeal regarding a Draft Plan of Condominium, arguing they had a 50% ownership interest in the subject property and that their involvement was necessary to address servicing agreements.
The applicant opposed the motion, arguing the moving parties' concerns related to private contractual and ownership disputes rather than land use planning merits.
The Tribunal denied the motion, finding that private agreements are outside its jurisdiction and the moving parties failed to articulate specific planning concerns.
The Tribunal also consolidated the zoning and draft plan appeals and scheduled a settlement hearing.
