Rabab Meen

The applicant condominium corporation sought an order requiring the respondent owner to comply with parking rules by removing a stored vehicle from her assigned spot and ceasing to park a second vehicle in a visitor parking space.

The respondent argued she required the visitor space as a disability-related accommodation.

The Tribunal found that the respondent was improperly storing a vehicle in her assigned spot contrary to the rules.

Furthermore, while the respondent established a mobility-related disability, she failed to demonstrate a specific disability-related need to use the visitor parking space instead of her assigned spot.

The Tribunal ordered the respondent to comply with the parking rules and awarded costs to the applicant.

The respondent in a condominium dispute brought a motion requesting an indefinite adjournment of the hearing due to an emergency surgery and ongoing medical issues.

The Condominium Authority Tribunal denied the request, noting that the medical documentation provided did not meet the minimum standards set out in the Tribunal's Practice Direction and that the respondent had demonstrated the ability to maintain multiple other legal proceedings.

The Tribunal ordered the case to resume and extended a prior confidentiality order to the motion materials.

The respondent in a condominium dispute brought a motion for a further adjournment, submitting three doctor's notes.

The Condominium Authority Tribunal dismissed the motion, finding that the first note provided no new information and the request was an abuse of process as the issue had already been decided.

The Tribunal noted that the second note regarding accessible parking was evidence for the substantive hearing, and the third note regarding written communication was an accommodation request that the Tribunal already meets.

The Tribunal ordered the case to resume and directed that the respondent's medical submissions remain confidential.

The respondent in a condominium parking dispute brought a motion requesting an indefinite adjournment of the proceedings due to medical reasons.

The Condominium Authority Tribunal denied the request, finding that an indefinite adjournment would cause significant delay and prejudice to the applicant.

The Tribunal noted that its written process and the ability to appoint a representative could accommodate the respondent's disability, and ordered the case to resume.

The respondent in a condominium parking dispute brought a motion seeking a confidentiality order, dismissal of the case, or an adjournment.

The Condominium Authority Tribunal granted the confidentiality order on consent, finding the personal and medical information met the required standard.

The tribunal declined to dismiss the case, finding it was not a minor issue and had a reasonable prospect of success.

A partial adjournment was granted to allow the respondent time to prepare and participate in the process.