The applicant railway company sought judicial review of an arbitration award that upheld a union grievance concerning work jurisdiction.
The arbitrator found that the applicant improperly assigned yard service work to a road service conductor-only crew, contrary to the collective agreement.
The Divisional Court applied the reasonableness standard of review and concluded that the arbitrator's interpretation of the collective agreement and application to the specific facts was intelligible, transparent, and justified.
The application for judicial review was dismissed.
