Petar Guzina

The appellant landlord appealed a Landlord and Tenant Board (LTB) order that found the tenant’s use of parking spot 69 was an implied term of the lease and denied the landlord’s application to terminate the tenancy.

The Superior Court upheld the LTB’s decision, finding that the Residential Tenancies Act (RTA) allows for implied terms and that the LTB properly considered the pattern of conduct and statutory context.

The landlord’s argument that the lease allowed for unilateral reallocation of parking was rejected.

The appeal was dismissed.

The tenant appealed a Landlord and Tenant Board decision that denied a motion to set aside an eviction order.

The eviction was ordered after the tenant failed to make payments required under a prior consent order.

The Divisional Court dismissed the appeal, finding no error of law, as the LTB's decision was based on factual findings regarding the tenant's failure to pay.

The eviction was permitted to be enforced, and costs were awarded to the landlord.

The appellant landlords appealed three decisions of the Landlord and Tenant Board finding they terminated a tenancy in bad faith and denying two subsequent review requests.

The landlords failed to attend the initial hearing, claiming confusion over multiple hearing notices.

The Divisional Court dismissed the appeal, finding no breach of procedural fairness or error of law.

The Board reasonably proceeded in the landlords' absence, considered their late-filed evidence, and properly denied the review requests due to the landlords' lack of diligence in failing to attend or seek clarification.