The applicant children's aid society brought a motion for an order placing the child in its temporary care and custody.
The respondent father and stepmother sought the child's return to their care, while the respondent mother sought unsupervised access.
The court found credible and trustworthy evidence that the child was exposed to a high conflict environment and inappropriate discipline in the father and stepmother's care, creating a risk of emotional and physical harm.
The court concluded that a supervision order would not adequately protect the child and ordered that the child remain in the temporary care and custody of the society with specified access for the respondents.