Who is Paul Schwartzman?

Paul Schwartzman is an Ontario lawyer with 3 court cases on record from 2015 to 2026.

What courts has Paul Schwartzman appeared in?

Paul Schwartzman has appeared in Superior Court of Justice.

How many cases has Paul Schwartzman handled?

Paul Schwartzman has 3 cases on record from 2015 to 2026.

What judges has Paul Schwartzman appeared before?

Paul Schwartzman has most frequently appeared before Justice Suhail A.Q. Akhtar, Justice Sam P. Rappos, Justice D. Wilson.

Paul Schwartzman

3 total

Nusrat Saleem v. University Health Network, 2026 ONSC 1208

The plaintiff, a former registered perfusionist employed by the defendant hospital, brought a motion for leave to amend his statement of claim in a wrongful dismissal and human rights action, to transfer the action from simplified to ordinary procedure, and to impose a litigation timetable.

The proposed amendments added 48 new paragraphs, claims for moral/aggravated and punitive damages, and detailed factual allegations responding to the defence.

The court granted the motion in part, permitting most amendments as particularizations of the existing causes of action, but refused amendments relating to a forced resignation in February 2022 and mitigation-related allegations as new causes of action raised outside the limitation period.

SCJMar 10, 2026

Applicant Counsel

Rossi v. Sanna Health Corp., 2021 ONSC 8308

The defendants' counsel brought a motion to be removed from the record shortly before a scheduled wrongful dismissal trial.

The plaintiff opposed any adjournment of the trial date but did not oppose the removal of counsel.

The court granted the motion to remove counsel due to a breakdown in the relationship and lack of instructions following a corporate acquisition.

However, the court refused to adjourn the trial date, finding that the corporate defendant had ignored the approaching trial and that an adjournment would unfairly prejudice the plaintiff.

SCJDec 17, 2021

Respondent Counsel

Dear v. Glamour Designs Ltd., 2015 ONSC 5094

The plaintiff brought a motion for summary judgment in a wrongful dismissal action following termination after approximately ten years of employment within a family-run corporate group.

The defendant argued that the plaintiff had been employed by two separate companies and that the earlier employer had terminated his employment prior to the transition.

The court held that the related corporations constituted a common employer due to common control, overlapping leadership, and integrated operations.

The court further found that the plaintiff had adequately mitigated his damages and that no genuine issue requiring a trial existed.

Summary judgment was granted, awarding damages for nine months’ notice plus out‑of‑pocket benefits losses.

SCJAug 14, 2015