The appellants were convicted of second degree murder for stabbing a plainclothes police officer to steal his vehicle.
They appealed their convictions, arguing that the Crown's failure to disclose that two other surveillance officers were drinking outside the jurisdiction during the incident violated their right to full disclosure and constituted an abuse of process.
The Court of Appeal dismissed the conviction appeals, finding the undisclosed information would not have affected the trial's fairness or the credibility of the responding officer.
The Court also dismissed the sentence appeals, upholding parole ineligibility periods of 16 and 18 years due to the need to denounce the murder of an on-duty police officer and the appellants' violent criminal records.
