The applicant sought child support, spousal support, and a declaration of unjust enrichment regarding a property purchased by the respondent.
The court imputed income to the respondent for child support purposes, finding he unreasonably deducted business expenses from his employment income.
The court awarded the applicant spousal support of $200 per month for 24 months due to her financial dependence and child care obligations.
However, the court dismissed the applicant's unjust enrichment claim, finding no intention between the parties to co-own the property and concluding the funds advanced were for living expenses and debt repayment.
