The applicant father brought a motion for increased parenting time with the parties' 7-year-old child pending a 21-day trial.
The father sought equal time or, alternatively, an additional evening.
A section 30 assessment report raised concerns about the mother's ability to support the child's relationship with the father and noted the child's clear alignment with the mother.
The court found that leaving the status quo in place pending trial would jeopardize the child's relationship with the father.
The court granted the motion in part, awarding the father additional overnights but declining to order equal time on an interim basis.
