The applicant mother and respondent father each brought motions following a case conference.
The respondent sought to set aside a procedural order granting the applicant leave to bring substantive motions, arguing inadequate notice.
The applicant sought interim child support, spousal support, and contribution to orthodontic expenses.
The court dismissed the respondent's motion, finding he had adequate notice of the case conference and the court had jurisdiction to make procedural orders.
The court granted the applicant's motion, ordering the respondent to pay interim Table child support of $1,769 per month, 70% of orthodontic expenses, and interim spousal support of $2,500 per month, which was adjusted downwards to account for the respondent's ongoing payment of the joint mortgage.