Court File and Parties

CITATION: Patel v. Patel, 2023 ONSC 6248

DIVISIONAL COURT FILE NO.: 23-476-ML

DATE: 20231129

SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE – ONTARIO

DIVISIONAL COURT

RE: SANJAY PATEL, Applicant/Appellant in Appeal

AND:

beejal sesha yogesh patel, Respondent/Respondent in Appeal

BEFORE: Sachs, Backhouse and Mew JJ.

COUNSEL: Heather Hansen and Haya Sakakini, for the Applicant/Appellant in Appeal

Michael J. Stangarone, for the Respondent/Respondent in Appeal

HEARD: in writing

ENDORSEMENT

[1] The motion for leave to appeal the order of Emery J., dated July 20,2023 is dismissed. The absence of reasons from the motion judge for three and a half months justified the bringing of this motion for leave to appeal. Therefore, there shall be no order as to costs. While we are not making an order to this effect, it is our view that the best interests of the child would be best served by bringing this matter on for trial as quickly as possible.

Sachs J.

Backhouse J.

Mew J.

Released: November 29, 2023