The Respondent father sought unsupervised and increased parenting time, including overnights, and equal parenting time after Labour Day.
The Applicant mother opposed this, requesting the continuation of supervised parenting time and bringing a cross-motion for primary residence and sole decision-making responsibility.
The court, applying the best interests of the child test, granted the father unsupervised daytime parenting time and supervised overnight parenting time, acknowledging his efforts to address past issues while noting serious concerns regarding his criminal history and lack of accountability.
The Applicant's cross-motion for sole decision-making and primary residence was dismissed as premature.