Court of Appeal for Ontario

CITATION: Crawford v. Carey, 2015 ONCA 40

DATE: 20150122

DOCKET: C59392

Before: Doherty, Rouleau & Watt JJ.A.

BETWEEN

Fred Crawford and Jose Luque

Plaintiffs (Appellants)

and

Ruth Carey, Lilian Ma, Michael Gottheil, David Wright, Guy Savoy, Egya Sangmuah, Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario as represented by the Attorney General of Ontario, Ron Kashin/Goldenrod Investments Incorporated, Fred Dyer/Rivet Development Corporation, Jason Bogle/Sack QC & Bogle Law Professional Corporation, Allan Socken/Socken Law Professional Corporation, and Jeff Shabes/J.E.M.S. Paralegal Services Professional Corporation

Defendants (Respondent)

Counsel:

Fred Crawford, for the plaintiffs (appellants)

Scott A. Crocco, for the defendant (respondent) Allan Socken

Heard: January 5, 2015

On appeal from the order of Justice Chiappetta of the Superior Court of Justice, dated August 27, 2014.

APPEAL BOOK ENDORSEMENT

[1] We would dismiss the appeal. The statement does not plead facts as against the defendant capable of supporting any of the causes of action as pled.

[2] Like the motion judge, we see no basis upon which to grant the appellants leave to amend. The appeal is dismissed.

[3] Costs to the respondent in the amount of $2,500, inclusive of disbursements and relevant taxes.