CITATION: Royal Bank of Canada v. Lukezic, 2011 ONCA 314
DATE: 20110420
DOCKET: C52487
COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO
Goudge, Gillese and Watt JJ.A.
BETWEEN
Royal Bank of Canada
Respondent
and
James Joseph Lukezic, Walker Hall Winery Ltd., Lukezic Group Ltd. and Walker Hall Group Ltd.
Appellant
James Joseph Lukezic, acting in person
Milton A. Davis, for the respondent
Robert J. Van Kessell, for BDO Canada Limited, the receiver
Heard: April 19, 2011
On appeal from the judgment of Justice Geoffrey B. Morawetz of the Superior Court of Justice dated July 30, 2010.
APPEAL BOOK ENDORSEMENT
[1] In our view, Morawetz J. accorded the appellant a very full and fair hearing. He could find no basis on the material before him to conclude that the appellant’s consent to the receivership order was obtained through fraud. Nor was there evidence, at least before him, of the consent being conditioned on an advance of $150,000, although that issue may well be the subject of the appellant’s action against his former lawyer. We can see no basis for interfering with these findings and as a consequence the appeal must be dismissed. Costs to the Bank of $3,000 and to the receiver of $500.

