W A R N I N G
The President of the panel hearing this appeal directs that the following should be attached to the file:
An order restricting publication in this proceeding under ss. 486.4(1), (2), (3) or (4) or 486.6(1) or (2)
of the Criminal Code shall continue. These sections of the Criminal Code provide:
486.4 (1) Subject to subsection (2), the presiding judge or justice may make an order directing that any information that could identify the complainant or a witness shall not be published in any document or broadcast or transmitted in any way, in proceedings in respect of
(a) any of the following offences:
(i) an offence under section 151, 152, 153, 153.1, 155, 159, 160, 162, 163.1, 170, 171, 172, 172.1, 173, 210, 211, 212, 213, 271, 272, 273, 279.01, 279.02, 279.03, 346 or 347,
(ii) an offence under section 144 (rape), 145 (attempt to commit rape), 149 (indecent assault on female), 156 (indecent assault on male) or 245 (common assault) or subsection 246(1) (assault with intent) of the Criminal Code, chapter C-34 of the Revised Statutes of Canada, 1970, as it read immediately before January 4, 1983, or
(iii) an offence under subsection 146(1) (sexual intercourse with a female under 14) or (2) (sexual intercourse with a female between 14 and 16) or section 151 (seduction of a female between 16 and 18), 153 (sexual intercourse with step-daughter), 155 (buggery or bestiality), 157 (gross indecency), 166 (parent or guardian procuring defilement) or 167 (householder permitting defilement) of the Criminal Code, chapter C-34 of the Revised Statutes of Canada, 1970, as it read immediately before January 1, 1988; or
(b) two or more offences being dealt with in the same proceeding, at least one of which is an offence referred to in any of subparagraphs (a)(i) to (iii).
(2) In proceedings in respect of the offences referred to in paragraph (1)(a) or (b), the presiding judge or justice shall
(a) at the first reasonable opportunity, inform any witness under the age of eighteen years and the complainant of the right to make an application for the order; and
(b) on application made by the complainant, the prosecutor or any such witness, make the order.
(3) In proceedings in respect of an offence under section 163.1, a judge or justice shall make an order directing that any information that could identify a witness who is under the age of eighteen years, or any person who is the subject of a representation, written material or a recording that constitutes child pornography within the meaning of that section, shall not be published in any document or broadcast or transmitted in any way.
(4) An order made under this section does not apply in respect of the disclosure of information in the course of the administration of justice when it is not the purpose of the disclosure to make the information known in the community. 2005, c. 32, s. 15; 2005, c. 43, s. 8(3)(b).
486.6 (1) Every person who fails to comply with an order made under subsection 486.4(1), (2) or (3) or 486.5(1) or (2) is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction.
(2) For greater certainty, an order referred to in subsection (1) applies to prohibit, in relation to proceedings taken against any person who fails to comply with the order, the publication in any document or the broadcasting or transmission in any way of information that could identify a victim, witness or justice system participant whose identity is protected by the order. 2005, c. 32, s. 15.
CITATION: R. v. P. P., 2009 ONCA 99
DATE: 20090202
DOCKET: C46848
COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO
Sharpe, Armstrong and Watt JJ.A.
BETWEEN:
Her Majesty the Queen
Respondent
and
P. P.
Appellant
Christopher Hicks, for the appellant
Elise Nakelsky, for the respondent
Heard and released orally: January 27, 2009
On appeal from the sentence imposed by Justice T. D. Little of the Superior Court of Justice dated March 20, 2006.
ENDORSEMENT
[1] The appellant was convicted of two counts of sexual interference on two young children of his female partner. He was sentenced to nine years in respect of one count and three years consecutive on the other count. An order was made that he would not be eligible for parole for five years.
[2] This is a sentence appeal in which the appellant asserts two main grounds of appeal:
(i) the trial judge failed to give appropriate assistance to the appellant who was unrepresented; and
(ii) the sentence of twelve years in its totality was manifestly unfit.
[3] We would not give effect to the first ground of appeal. In our view, the trial judge did all that he could in the circumstances. This appellant was not particularly receptive to advice given by the trial judge. The trial judge continually urged the appellant to retain counsel and he declined to do so.
[4] We would give effect, however, to the second ground of appeal. In our view, a total sentence of twelve years is simply beyond the range for these kinds of offences where there was no violence, no threats of violence and no intercourse.
[5] In the result, we would grant leave to appeal and allow the appeal by reducing the nine year sentence to six years and thereby reducing the total sentence to nine years. We would remove the restriction on parole eligibility.
“Robert Sharpe J.A.”
“Robert P. Armstrong J.A.”
“David Watt J.A.”