Ontario Labour Relations Board

The applicant union sought to withdraw its application against the responding party employer.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave and the application was withdrawn.

The applicant requested to withdraw the application.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave and the application was withdrawn.

The parties agreed to adjourn the application sine die for a period not exceeding one year.

The Board granted the consent adjournment, noting that the matter would be deemed terminated if neither party requested to proceed within that time.

The applicant filed a duty of fair representation complaint against the union under section 74 of the Labour Relations Act, seeking to have his discharge grievance advanced to arbitration.

The grievance had previously been settled at mediation, with the applicant signing a settlement that included his resignation and a payment of over $34,000.

The Board dismissed the complaint, finding that the union did not act arbitrarily, discriminatorily, or in bad faith, and that the settlement was reasonable given the employer's evidence regarding the alleged patient abuse.

The applicant union and responding employer agreed to adjourn the application sine die.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board consented to the adjournment for a period not exceeding one year, noting that the matter would be deemed terminated if no party requested to proceed within that time.

The parties agreed to adjourn the application sine die.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board consented to the adjournment for a period not exceeding one year, after which the matter will be deemed terminated if neither party requests to proceed.

The applicant union filed an application for certification and an unfair labour practice complaint against the responding employer.

The employer also filed an unfair labour practice complaint against the union and an individual.

At the scheduled hearing, the parties resolved the matters in dispute.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board directed a second representation vote for the agreed-upon bargaining unit of carpenters and carpenters' apprentices.

The unfair labour practice complaints were withdrawn with leave of the Board.

The applicant sought to withdraw the application.

Having regard to the agreement of the parties, the Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the application.

The applicant union and responding employer agreed to adjourn the application sine die.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board consented to the adjournment for a period not exceeding one year, after which the matter will be deemed terminated if neither party requests to proceed.

The applicant sought to amend its name in an application for a declaration of successor rights following a transfer of jurisdiction.

The responding parties did not oppose the request, and the Board granted the amendment.

However, the Board noted that the name change created a new issue regarding the identity of the successor entity in the underlying transfer agreement, and directed the parties to file further written submissions on this issue.

The parties agreed to adjourn the application sine die for a period not exceeding one year.

The Board consented to the adjournment, noting that the matter would be deemed terminated if neither party requested to proceed within that time.

The parties reached an agreement regarding unfair labour practice complaints and a certification application.

The Board granted leave to withdraw the unfair labour practice complaints and directed that a new representation vote be taken for the agreed-upon voting constituency of employees of Sunlite Floor Cleaners.

The applicant union sought to withdraw its application against the responding party employer.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the application.

The parties agreed to adjourn the applications sine die.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board consented to the adjournment for a period not exceeding one year, after which the matters will be deemed terminated if no party requests to proceed.

The parties brought a joint application under section 36 of the Crown Employees Collective Bargaining Act, 1993 for the determination of essential services issues.

Most issues were resolved by agreement.

The Board determined the remaining two issues based on written pleadings, ordering specific language for Articles 7.2 and 8.2 regarding Association dues and working hours for essential/emergency workers during a strike or lock-out.

The applicant union and responding employer agreed to adjourn the application sine die.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board consented to the adjournment for a period not exceeding one year, after which the matter will be deemed terminated if no party requests to proceed.

The applicant, Northern Leisure Manufacturing, sought to withdraw its application against the responding parties.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave and the application was withdrawn.

The applicant sought a review of a refusal to issue an order under section 68 of the Employment Standards Act.

The parties subsequently entered into written Minutes of Settlement with the assistance of a Labour Relations Officer.

As the settlement disposed of all issues in dispute, the Board terminated the application in accordance with subsection 69.1(5) of the Act.

The applicant union and responding parties agreed to adjourn the applications sine die for a period not exceeding one year.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board consented to the adjournment, noting that the matters would be deemed terminated if no party requested to proceed within that time.

The applicant requested a reconsideration of the Board's decision dated August 16, 2001.

The Board noted its broad discretion to reconsider decisions under section 21.2(1) of the Statutory Powers Procedure Act, but emphasized that it requires good reasons to do so, such as an obvious error, new evidence, or important policy issues.

The Board found that the applicant's request was merely an attempt to reargue the case and did not meet the criteria for reconsideration.

The application for reconsideration was denied.