Ontario Labour Relations Board

The applicant sought to withdraw its application.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the application.

The applicant filed an application against the responding party union, with the employer intervening.

Having regard to a letter from the applicant, the Ontario Labour Relations Board terminated the application.

The employer requested that the Ontario Labour Relations Board dismiss the application in accordance with minutes of settlement.

The Board ordered that unless the applicant advised otherwise by January 5, 2001, the application would be dismissed.

The applicant requested an adjournment of the application.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted the request and adjourned the matter to January 8, 2002.

The applicant union filed applications against the responding parties.

The Board extended the terminal date to January 15, 2001.

Noting that mail for some responding parties was returned as 'Moved', the Board directed the applicant to provide a valid address for service before the matters could proceed.

The applicant filed a duty of fair representation complaint against the union regarding its investigation into his layoff by the employer.

The Board found a genuine factual dispute between the parties concerning the nature and quality of the union's investigation, as the applicant alleged the layoff was a pretext for discharge after he raised an overtime concern.

The Board referred the matter to the Registrar to be listed for a hearing.

The applicant union breached a settlement agreement by paying a $1,000 photocopying fee late.

The responding employers sought to have the applications dismissed as a consequence of the breach, and requested that the Board consider representations made during the mediation process.

The Board panel, having mediated the settlement, decided to recuse itself from determining the consequences of the breach, as it would be inappropriate for the panel to hear evidence regarding confidential mediation communications.

The matter was referred to the Registrar to assign a different panel to hear the employers' request for dismissal.

The applicant union referred a construction industry grievance to arbitration under the Labour Relations Act, 1995.

The responding party failed to attend the scheduled hearing.

Proceeding in the responding party's absence, the Board considered the applicant's evidence and found that the responding party was bound by and had violated the collective agreement.

The Board ordered the responding party to pay $10,759.89 in damages and $752.00 in statutory fees.

The applicant union applied for certification to represent academic staff at the University of Sudbury.

A representation vote was held, and more than fifty percent of the ballots cast were in favour of the applicant.

The employer raised issues regarding the conduct of the vote, but the Board found that even if all disputed votes were cast against the applicant, the union would still have majority support.

Accordingly, the Board directed that a certificate issue to the applicant.

The applicant employer sought a review of an Order to Pay under section 68 of the Employment Standards Act.

The workplace parties entered into Minutes of Settlement.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board ordered the disbursement of the $25,900.44 held in trust by the Director of Employment Standards to the employer, the employees, and the Consolidated Revenue Fund in accordance with the settlement.

The applicants filed an application to terminate bargaining rights under section 63(2) of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.

The responding trade union objected, arguing the application was untimely under section 58(1) because the collective agreement's term of operation extended until at least June 2002, despite its stated expiry of February 28, 2002.

The Board directed the applicants and the intervening employer to provide written submissions on the union's timeliness objection.

The applicant filed a request for reconsideration of a Board decision dismissing his applications under sections 74 and 76 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.

The request was filed 33 days after the decision, well beyond the 20-day time limit set out in Rule 96 of the Board's Rules of Procedure.

As the applicant provided no explanation for the delay, the Board declined to relieve against the time limits and dismissed the request for reconsideration.

The applicant employer filed an application for review of an Employment Standards Officer's Order to Pay.

The applicant provided a cheque to pay the order amount into trust, but the cheque was returned for insufficient funds.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board dismissed the application for review because the applicant failed to comply with the statutory requirement under section 68(7) of the Employment Standards Act to pay the amount of the order into trust within the time limit.

The employer applied for a review of an Order to Pay under the Employment Standards Act.

The Ministry of Labour advised the Board that the employer's cheque for payment of the order in trust was returned by the bank.

Under section 68(7) of the Act, an application for review is not properly made unless the applicant pays the amount to the Director in trust.

Since the payment was not made within the 45-day time limit, the application was dismissed.

The applicant union applied for certification to represent clerical employees of the responding party municipality.

Following a representation vote where more than fifty per cent of the ballots were cast in favour of the union, and with no statements of desire to make representations filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board ordered that a certificate issue to the applicant.

The applicant, Living Lighting, sought to withdraw its application against the responding parties, Eric Theisen, Inspector, and the Ministry of Labour.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the application.

The applicant union sought to withdraw its applications against the responding parties.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the applications.

The applicant, General Motors of Canada, sought to withdraw its application.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the application.

The applicant union and responding union agreed to adjourn the application sine die.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board consented to the adjournment for a period not exceeding one year, after which the matter will be deemed terminated if neither party requests to proceed.

The applicant filed an application regarding employee status under section 114(2) of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.

Counsel for the responding party advised the Board that the union was misidentified in the application.

The Board ordered the style of cause amended to reflect the correct name of the responding party, the Canadian Union of Public Employees and its Local 4366.