The father brought a motion against the Family Responsibility Office (FRO) and the mother, seeking a retroactive adjustment of child support and special expenses.
The court dismissed the motion against the FRO, finding it had correctly interpreted the previous court order.
The court converted the motion against the mother into a motion to change.
As the mother lived more than 150 km away and did not appear, the court issued a provisional order under section 44 of the Family Law Act, imputing an annual income of $70,000 to the mother, adjusting child support retroactively to 2016, and ordering her to pay her share of special expenses.