Following a trial concerning allegations of negligence by municipal officials relating to the requirement of a building permit for a deck constructed at a multi-unit residential property, the plaintiffs were unsuccessful.
The plaintiffs had originally advanced a claim for malicious prosecution but abandoned it shortly before trial, while continuing to seek aggravated and punitive damages based on allegations of improper and dishonest conduct by municipal officials.
The defendant municipality sought substantial indemnity costs, arguing that the plaintiffs pursued speculative and serious allegations without evidentiary foundation and forced extensive preparation, including for claims later withdrawn.
The court found the plaintiffs advanced excessive and unfounded allegations and had rejected several settlement offers from the defendant.
Substantial indemnity costs were therefore justified, though the court reduced the quantum sought and fixed costs at $70,000 inclusive of HST.