The appellant appealed a trial judgment regarding a real estate commission split, arguing the trial judge erred by admitting oral evidence that altered a written termination agreement.
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, finding the oral evidence was admissible to complete the non-exhaustive agreement and to establish the appellant's misrepresentation regarding the properties he was working on.
The court also dismissed the appeal regarding an alleged award to a non-party and upheld the trial judge's discretionary costs award.
