In a mortgage enforcement action, the self-represented defendant brought a motion seeking directions and Crown consultation based on pseudolegal arguments regarding Indigenous rights.
The plaintiff requested the motion be dismissed under Rule 2.1.02.
The court found the defendant's motion was nonsensical, lacked legal merit, and relied on Organized Pseudolegal Commercial Arguments (OPCA) to avoid liability.
The court granted the plaintiff's request, dismissing the defendant's motion as frivolous, vexatious, and an abuse of process, and prohibited the defendant from bringing further motions without leave.
