Multiple defendants moved to strike a self-represented plaintiff's statement of claim as disclosing no reasonable cause of action and, in one instance, to set aside a noting in default.
The court held that the plaintiff's allegations were vague, nonsensical, unsupported, and in several respects beyond the court's jurisdiction, including challenges relating to information access and social benefits matters.
Applying the governing test for setting aside default and the pleading standard for striking claims, the court found the action frivolous, vexatious, and an abuse of process.
The noting in default against one defendant was set aside, and the statement of claim was struck in its entirety against all moving defendants without leave to amend.
