7 total
The court accepted withdrawing counsel's denial of misconduct allegations and declined further inquiry.
This endorsement addresses issues arising from the withdrawal of the applicant's counsel, Mr. Singha, following serious allegations by the respondent that counsel was aware of an alleged false marriage involving the applicant.
The court accepted counsel's categorical denial, noting his honourable decision to withdraw from the litigation.
The judge concluded that further inquiry into the allegations against counsel would be unproductive and costly, and closed the matter.
Directions were provided for the orderly transfer of the file to new counsel.
Small Claims Court appeal dismissed; no error in trial judge's evidentiary rulings or credibility assessments.
The tenant appealed a Small Claims Court judgment awarding the landlord net damages for property damage to a leased commercial premises.
The tenant advanced four grounds of appeal, including evidentiary rulings, credibility assessments, and the trial judge's failure to advise her to retain counsel.
The Divisional Court dismissed the appeal, finding no errors of law or palpable and overriding errors of fact.
The court awarded the landlord substantial indemnity costs due to a Rule 49 offer to settle and the tenant's confusing and unnecessarily expensive approach to the appeal.
Appeal dismissed; statement of claim properly struck as frivolous, vexatious, and disclosing no reasonable cause of action.
The appellant appealed from orders striking his statement of claim against seven respondents without leave to amend and setting aside a noting in default against one respondent.
The motions judge found the claims, which included allegations of torture and invasion of privacy, to be frivolous, vexatious, an abuse of process, and lacking any reasonable cause of action.
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, finding no basis to interfere with the decision to set aside the noting in default and agreeing that the pleadings were properly struck under Rules 21.01(1)(b) and 25.11(b) of the Rules of Civil Procedure.
Successful applicant awarded costs after rectification of Land Titles Register.
Following a successful application for rectification of the Land Titles Register to reflect a historical right-of-way, the applicant sought costs.
The respondent argued that no costs should be awarded because the registration omission resulted from an administrative error and because the applicant had not previously provided notice of reliance on the right-of-way registered under the Registry Act.
The court rejected these submissions and held that the successful party was entitled to its costs.
The applicant’s bill of costs was found to be fair and reasonable and was granted.
Administrative conversion error did not extinguish the right of way.
The applicant sought a declaration and rectification of title to reflect an express right of way over the respondent's servient lands that had been granted under the Registry Act but omitted from the servient parcel register when the lands were administratively converted to Land Titles.
The court held that the respondent acquired only LT Conversion Qualified title and was subject to the overriding interests preserved by s. 44(1) of the Land Titles Act, including easements, despite the omission from the servient register.
Relying on the statutory scheme and analogous authority concerning administrative conversion errors, the court found the right of way ought to have been noted and ordered rectification.
The order was made without prejudice to any future action alleging abandonment or extinguishment of the easement.
Frivolous multi-defendant claim struck entirely without leave to amend.
Multiple defendants moved to strike a self-represented plaintiff's statement of claim as disclosing no reasonable cause of action and, in one instance, to set aside a noting in default.
The court held that the plaintiff's allegations were vague, nonsensical, unsupported, and in several respects beyond the court's jurisdiction, including challenges relating to information access and social benefits matters.
Applying the governing test for setting aside default and the pleading standard for striking claims, the court found the action frivolous, vexatious, and an abuse of process.
The noting in default against one defendant was set aside, and the statement of claim was struck in its entirety against all moving defendants without leave to amend.
Appeal of judgment for mortgage fraud dismissed; trial judge's credibility findings and assistance to self-represented litigant upheld.
The appellant appealed a trial judgment ordering her to pay damages and costs for fraudulent misrepresentations made to obtain a mortgage loan.
The appellant argued the trial judge erred in evaluating the evidence, rejecting her claim that she was an innocent dupe in a mortgage fraud scheme, and failing to assist her as a self-represented litigant.
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, finding the trial judge's credibility findings were supported by the evidence and that the appellant had participated fully at trial without any failure of assistance by the judge.
Costs of the appeal were awarded to the respondent.
