The accused, R.T., was charged with sexual touching, sexual assault, and voyeurism against his daughter.
The court assessed the credibility of both the complainant and the accused, finding the complainant to be a credible witness and the accused's testimony not credible.
The court found the accused guilty of two counts of sexual assault (counts 2 and 4), with the related sexual touching counts (1 and 3) conditionally stayed on the Kienapple principle.
The accused was found not guilty of voyeurism (count 5) because the entry into the bathroom, though a breach of privacy, was not "surreptitious" as required by the Criminal Code.
