The applicant sought statutory accident benefits following a motor vehicle accident.
The respondent denied the benefits, arguing the applicant's injuries fell within the Minor Injury Guideline (MIG).
The applicant argued for removal from the MIG based on a pre-existing injury, chronic pain, and psychological impairments.
The Tribunal found the applicant failed to demonstrate that her injuries warranted removal from the MIG, preferring the respondent's medical evidence that the injuries were uncomplicated soft tissue injuries and that there was no accident-related psychological injury.
The application for benefits and interest was dismissed.
