The applicant, a minor represented by her father, brought an application alleging "health abuse" through ultrasound exposure and unauthorized medical interventions, seeking broad and imprecise relief including rights to employment equality and prevention of asset theft.
The court, on its own initiative under Rule 2.1.01(1) of the Rules of Civil Procedure, called for submissions on why the application should not be dismissed as frivolous, vexatious, or an abuse of process.
The father's submissions did not address the substance of the court's concerns.
The court found the pleaded facts did not link to the relief sought, the relief was imprecise and unsustainable (e.g., seeking restoration of health or prevention of future theft), and dismissed the application.
