The applicant, Wilcason Bullock, moved to vary a 2012 child support order, claiming reduced income and that his children were no longer "children of the marriage." The respondent, Michelle Bullock, moved to dismiss his variation motion due to his repeated breaches of multiple court orders, including non-payment of support arrears, non-payment of interest on costs, failure to provide proof of life insurance, and persistent financial non-disclosure.
The court found that the applicant deliberately breached these orders, which undermined the respondent's ability to respond to his motion and secure a fair determination of the issues.
The court dismissed the applicant's motion to vary, ordered him to redeem his RRSP to reduce arrears, and pay the respondent's costs.
