The appellant appealed a judgment dismissing his personal injury action following a jury verdict.
The jury found that the motor vehicle accident did not cause or materially contribute to any of the appellant's injuries, despite assessing damages at $25,000 for pain and suffering.
The appellant argued the verdict was perverse and that the trial judge erred in evidentiary rulings regarding expert witnesses.
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, finding that the jury's verdict was reasonable given the central issue of the appellant's credibility and the defendants' position at trial.
The court also found no reversible error in the trial judge's evidentiary rulings.
