The applicant insurer sought judicial review of a FSCO Director's Delegate decision that allowed an insured's appeal in part regarding statutory accident benefits.
The insurer had denied claims for an in-home assessment and form preparation, alleging the clinics were engaged in a fraudulent scheme.
The Divisional Court held that the Director's Delegate exceeded his jurisdiction by interfering with the Arbitrator's findings of fact regarding the in-home assessment, as appeals are limited to questions of law.
However, the court upheld the decision requiring the insurer to pay for form preparation because the insurer failed to object to the application within the statutory timeframe.