The appellant appealed his summary conviction for operating a motor vehicle with a blood alcohol concentration exceeding the legal limit.
He argued the trial judge erred in dismissing his Charter applications under ss. 8, 9, 10(b), and 11(b), and in failing to exclude evidence under s. 24(2).
The Superior Court of Justice found no palpable or overriding errors in the trial judge's factual findings or legal analysis regarding the roadside screening demand, the appellant's waiver of his right to counsel, or the calculation of trial delay.
The appeal was dismissed.
