This sentencing decision arose from convictions against a corporation and its directing mind for acting as unlicensed builders and failing to comply with new home warranty and enrolment requirements in connection with two high-value custom home projects.
The court treated the offences as regulatory consumer protection offences and applied the Cotton Felts factors, emphasizing denunciation and general deterrence where the individual knowingly structured his conduct to avoid statutory compliance.
Although the individual defendant proved serious present financial hardship, the court found that nominal fines would fail to deter and that some restitution was legally required given the direct, quantifiable homeowner loss.
The court imposed substantial fines, suspended sentences on the remaining counts, and reduced but significant freestanding restitution orders.