The Ontario Review Board held a hearing to review four restrictions of liberty (seclusions) imposed on the accused, who was previously found not criminally responsible for robbery and uttering threats.
The hospital presented evidence that the seclusions were necessary due to the accused's escalating violent behaviour, threats, and refusal to take antipsychotic medication.
The accused conceded that the initial decisions to seclude were justified but challenged the length of the detentions.
The Board found that all four seclusions were justified, necessary, and the least restrictive measures available to manage the risk of harm to others.
